ADVERTISEMENT
一位發文者在社群媒體上分享了他使用OpenAI 最新圖像生成模型DALL-E 3 所繪製的蝙蝠俠、小丑和羅賓組成的四格「漫畫」,而在社群媒體上,則有大量的文章嘲諷這則貼文,批評「A.I.藝術」創作的概念。
「AI藝術」是透過人工智慧機器學習過程創作的藝術作品,這意味著一台電腦/機器已經學習了諸如其他藝術家的過去作品和藝術風格,以及角色和圖像的描述等資訊,然後使用這些學習知識産生一幅新的圖像。餵給機器的知識幾乎都是來自人類,人類通常也會為藝術創作提供具體的引導指示,但實際的最終創作是由電腦/機器所產生的。
漫畫作家和粉絲對蝙蝠俠的「漫畫」反應不佳
OpenAI’s latest image generation model, DALL-E 3, makes it SO easy to create comic books!
— Ammaar Reshi (@ammaar) September 30, 2023
Here are 4 panels for a fan-made Batman comic made in under 5 minutes.
Prompts included in the ALT.
Enjoy!🔥 pic.twitter.com/9LhZj4I0KW
Ammaar Reshi分享了四格漫畫,其中蝙蝠俠發現羅賓處於危險之中,駕駛蝙蝠車前去,看到小丑正在威脅羅賓。這個漫畫似乎使用了布萊恩·博蘭(Brian Bolland)以及邁克·奧爾德(Mike Allred))的藝術風格來創作「A.I.藝術」。
漫畫作家哈維爾·羅德里格斯(Javier Rodriguez)指出,這與簡單粗暴的把其他漫畫書剪切並黏到漫畫中並沒有什麼不同……
You could do the same thing a while ago with a photocopier and some scissors. Stealing other people's art seems easier now and lucrative for those behind generative models. https://t.co/rJFvFjLjha
— Javier Rodríguez (@javiercaster) September 30, 2023
漫畫書藝術家拉蒙·維拉洛博斯(Ramon Villalobos)嘲笑了這個漫畫的結果……
This shit is a mess. Batmobile switches designs between "panels" 1 and 2 and joker clearly is swiped and the style is inconsistent through out. Not surprising ai art enthusiasts think its a huge achievement tho because they are complete dummies. https://t.co/qNba5yS3fx
— Villalobos (@RamonVillalobos) September 30, 2023
漫畫書作家丹尼爾·基布爾史密斯(Daniel Kibblesmith)對這個結果也很有意見……
Damn, it looks exactly like a computer churning out a dog shit impression of a batman comic, you guys did it https://t.co/sXkCCXWaZl
— Daniel Kibblesmith (@kibblesmith) September 30, 2023
漫畫書作家莎拉·霍洛克斯(Sarah Horrocks)則批評發文者了使用博蘭(Bolland)的作品...
That's literally just Brian Bolland's Joker. The shamelessness of this "technology" is appalling. I guess it's okay to steal. Just call it AI. https://t.co/U3siW0Xrsx
— Sarah Horrocks🐾👑 (@mercurialblonde) September 30, 2023
現在即使惹大家不爽,在社群媒體上也能弄到錢
前演員潔絲汀·貝特曼(Justine Bateman),已經成為藝術領域中使用人工智慧的強烈反對者,她認為DC必須在採取法律措施來保護這種情況的使用……
.@wbd @DCOfficial, the longer you wait to send legal teams to @OpenAI, etc to demand that generative #AI training sets containing your copyrighted work be deleted, the more you make your entire library “fair use.” Few will buy a studio without defensible copyrighted libraries. https://t.co/sOnO13bRAp
— Justine Bateman (@JustineBateman) September 30, 2023
屢獲殊榮的藝術家皮婭·格拉(Pia Guerra)指出,在這種情況下,社群媒體上的作品受到的參與度現在可以變現,因此即使是在貼文上進行批評也可以讓原始發表者從X的藍勾勾驗證的參與獎金中賺到錢……
Yes, the comic is garbage and made from stolen art, and he’ll never be able to make any money creating a wildly inconsistent book this way… but my, is he trying to make $ from his blue check engagement here.
— Pia Guerra (@PiaGuerra) September 30, 2023
Screenshot and eviscerate. Don’t engage with grifters.
當然,也有支持「A.I.藝術」的人對這篇貼文做出積極回應,但這些支持的聲音基本上被淹沒在一大片的反對聲音中。
請注意!留言要自負法律責任,相關案例層出不窮,請慎重發文!